Well, we FINALLY had our day in court :)  It began with a quick chat with the county worker when I pulled into the parking lot.  She informed me that bio mom has said that she has no problem with paternal g-ma adopting Sprout..um, WHAT!?!?!?!  Then she proceeded to tell me that my Lil Meatball might be coming into care but his aunt has been cleared to take him.  I was just so flustered that I had to get inside and SIT.  So, I get into the waiting room and I had to pick my poison.  Sit with paternal gma or bio mom.  I chose bio mom.  At least I'd get a laugh from the trash she talks...and I did.  She had some words on her shirt that were pretty offensive (which the judge later yelled at her for) and she she went on about how well Sprout is doing at the visit with her.  How he smiled at her (yes, moron, he's been smiling since JANUARY!!!).  She also told me how she 'read with him all the time when he was with her'.  Ok, chica.  Can we say delusional!?!?!?  He was with her for 4 DAYS in the hospital!!!!  She is a crazy one.  I told you I'd get a laugh from her.  Anyway, we got on the subject of kids and her 2 year olds adoption.  She went on to ask me if I'd adopt Sprout if I got the chance.  Again, I danced around the question because I was totally afraid of saying the wrong thing and she came right out and asked IF HE BECAME AVAILABLE FOR AD0PTI0N, WOULD WE AD0PT HIM so she knew he was in a good home?!?!  Well, when you put it that way, yes, I would.  And I told her so.  We were finally called into the court room and 'the donor' was present again.  

The highlights were as follows:

*county lawyer asked for an increase in visitation
*bio mom's lawyer called her missing visits since May 'a hiccup in visitation'
*Sprouts lawyer was offended at the 'hiccup' terminology because 'there should be NO REASON a mother is kept from her son'.
*'The donor' did NOT ask for visitation for Sprout because he felt that Sprout is too young to be subjected to the 5 hour drive and shouldn't see his 'donor' in jail.
*Sprout's lawyer asked to reconvene in 90 days instead of 60 days because this is bio mom's 3rd child she's represented and this shouldn't be prolonged. 

The judge agreed with Sprouts lawyer so we'll be back doing this (court) again in 3 months.  I am wondering why 'the donor' didn't ask to see the son he so desperately is claiming is his.  I wonder if paternal gma's doubts are settling in with him.  Or maybe (just maybe) he is a decent guy and really DOES want to spare his son from the stress of travel.  After court I met with the county worker again and she said I was 'cute' when I spoke about Sprout in court.  Not sure what that means.  She also said that she thinks bio mom will give up with visits and that in 3 months we'll be looking at either the beginning of TPR or a surrender.  She also said that paternal gma is the 'wild card ' right now.  Not sure what will happen there.  Hmm, too much to ponder.  Right now, I'm gonna just trust God that HE has this WHOLE situation in the palm of His hand.  I am also wondering if paternal gma risks losing the granddaughter she has custody of if her house does not clear certification (due to structural damage).  Much to think about.  I'd LOVE to hear your thoughts on the info given.  What do YOU think will happen?!?!